Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author
 hal.structure.identifier
FOURNIER, Benjamin
11230 Laboratoire de Métallurgie Physique et Génie des Matériaux [LMPGM]
211915 Mechanics surfaces and materials processing [MSMP]
dc.contributor.author
 hal.structure.identifier
RUPIN, Nicolas
1167 Laboratoire de mécanique des solides [LMS]
11230 Laboratoire de Métallurgie Physique et Génie des Matériaux [LMPGM]
dc.contributor.authorBIGERELLE, Maxence
dc.contributor.author
 hal.structure.identifier
NAJJAR, Denis
11230 Laboratoire de Métallurgie Physique et Génie des Matériaux [LMPGM]
dc.contributor.author
 hal.structure.identifier
IOST, Alain
211915 Mechanics surfaces and materials processing [MSMP]
11230 Laboratoire de Métallurgie Physique et Génie des Matériaux [LMPGM]
dc.contributor.authorWILCOX, R
dc.date.accessioned2016
dc.date.available2016
dc.date.issued2007
dc.date.submitted2015
dc.identifier.issn0167-9473
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10985/10868
dc.description.abstractThe method of moments is a popular technique for estimating the parameters of a generalized lambda distribution (GLD), but published results suggest that the percentile method gives superior results. However, the percentile method cannot be implemented in an automatic fashion, and automatic methods, like the starship method, can lead to prohibitive execution time with large sample sizes. A new estimation method is proposed that is automatic (it does not require the use of special tables or graphs), and it reduces the computational time. Based partly on the usual percentile method, this new method also requires choosing which quantile u to use when fitting a GLD to data. The choice for u is studied and it is found that the best choice depends on the final goal of the modeling process. The sampling distribution of the new estimator is studied and compared to the sampling distribution of estimators that have been proposed. Naturally, all estimators are biased and here it is found that the bias becomes negligible with sample sizes n⩾2×103. The .025 and .975 quantiles of the sampling distribution are investigated, and the difference between these quantiles is found to decrease proportionally to View the MathML source. The same results hold for the moment and percentile estimates. Finally, the influence of the sample size is studied when a normal distribution is modeled by a GLD. Both bounded and unbounded GLDs are used and the bounded GLD turns out to be the most accurate. Indeed it is shown that, up to n=106, bounded GLD modeling cannot be rejected by usual goodness-of-fit tests.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsPost-print
dc.subjectGLD
dc.subjectEstimating distributions
dc.subjectGoodness-of-fit
dc.subjectSimplex
dc.subjectPercentiles
dc.titleEstimating the parameters of a generalized lambda distribution
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.csda.2006.09.043
dc.typdocArticle dans une revue avec comité de lecture
dc.localisationCentre de Lille
dc.subject.halMathématique: Statistiques
dc.subject.halStatistiques: théorie
dc.subject.halStatistiques: méthodologie
ensam.audienceInternationale
ensam.page2813-2835
ensam.journalComputational Statistics and Data Analysis
ensam.volume51
ensam.issue6
ensam.peerReviewingOui
hal.identifierhal-01326519
hal.version1
hal.statusaccept


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record