Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSADEGHI, Samira
dc.contributor.authorDARGON, Thomas
dc.contributor.author
 hal.structure.identifier
RIVEST, Louis
136804 Ecole de Technologie Supérieure [Montréal] [ETS]
dc.contributor.author
 hal.structure.identifier
PERNOT, Jean-Philippe
178374 Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Information et des Systèmes : Ingénierie Numérique des Systèmes Mécaniques [LSIS- INSM]
dc.date.accessioned2016
dc.date.available2016
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.submitted2016
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10985/11400
dc.description.abstractCurrent Computer-Aided Design (CAD) packages support the storage of the final design models and solutions in different formats, and PLM software manages the high-level information about the design process, such as the versioning of the design solutions. However, the processes happening inside the CAD software are not being fully captured. Information such as the sequence of actions (create a sketch, set a distance constraint, remove a pocket, modify the diameter of a through hole, etc.), versioning of the created objects, etc. is missing. This information can be used to understand how a designer uses CAD software to generate geometric representations. In design companies, capturing this information during a product design project would help to evaluate the designer’s way of working with CAD software. In design education, collecting information on how design students generate geometric representations would allow teachers to identify the areas of misunderstanding, improve the education process by representing the optimal way of working, and help teachers to correctly evaluate their students’ performance in using CAD software. This paper proposes a framework to support an analysis of how designers use CAD software to generate geometric representations. This framework consists of structured models and an approach which guides the actor in capturing the design process. We use CATIA as a CAD software solution, but the proposed approach is generic and can be extended to any CAD software. The validity of the proposed approach is illustrated through a case study.
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsPost-print
dc.subjectCAD
dc.subjectModeling
dc.subjectDesign process
dc.subjectModeling process
dc.subjectSolid modeling
dc.subjectMetrics
dc.subjectPerformance
dc.titleCapturing and analysing how designers use CAD software
dc.typdocCommunication avec acte
dc.localisationCentre de Aix en Provence
dc.subject.halInformatique: Modélisation et simulation
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur: Mécanique
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur: Mécanique: Génie mécanique
ensam.audienceInternationale
ensam.conference.titleTools and Methods for Competitive Engineering (TMCE’16)
ensam.conference.date2016
ensam.countryFrance
ensam.title.proceedingProceeding of Tools and Methods for Competitive Engineering
ensam.page447-458
ensam.volume1
ensam.cityAix-en-Provence
ensam.peerReviewingOui
ensam.invitedCommunicationNon
ensam.proceedingOui
hal.identifierhal-01410451
hal.version1
hal.statusaccept


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record