Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author
 hal.structure.identifier
MARTIN, Guillaume
86289 Laboratoire Procédés et Ingénierie en Mécanique et Matériaux [PIMM]
470240 SDTools
dc.contributor.author
 hal.structure.identifier
BALMES, Etienne
86289 Laboratoire Procédés et Ingénierie en Mécanique et Matériaux [PIMM]
470240 SDTools
dc.contributor.authorCHANCELIER, Thierry
dc.date.accessioned2017
dc.date.available2017
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.submitted2017
dc.identifier.issn0888-3270
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10985/11675
dc.description.abstractWhile modal identification is a mature subject, very few studies address the characterization of errors associated with components of a mode shape. This is particularly important in test/analysis correlation procedures, where the Modal Assurance Criterion is used to pair modes and to localize at which sensors discrepancies occur. Poor correlation is usually attributed to modeling errors, but clearly identification errors also occur. In particular with 3D Scanning Laser Doppler Vibrometer measurement, many transfer functions are measured. As a result individual validation of each measurement cannot be performed manually in a reasonable time frame and a notable fraction of measurements is expected to be fairly noisy leading to poor identification of the associated mode shape components. The paper first addresses measurements and introduces multiple criteria. The error measures the difference between test and synthesized transfer functions around each resonance and can be used to localize poorly identified modal components. For intermediate error values, diagnostic of the origin of the error is needed. The level evaluates the transfer function amplitude in the vicinity of a given mode and can be used to eliminate sensors with low responses. A Noise Over Signal indicator, product of error and level, is then shown to be relevant to detect poorly excited modes and errors due to modal property shifts between test batches. Finally, a contribution is introduced to evaluate the visibility of a mode in each transfer. Using tests on a drum brake component, these indicators are shown to provide relevant insight into the quality of measurements. In a second part, test/analysis correlation is addressed with a focus on the localization of sources of poor mode shape correlation. The MACCo algorithm, which sorts sensors by the impact of their removal on a MAC computation, is shown to be particularly relevant. Combined with the error it avoids keeping erroneous modal components. Applied after removal of poor modal components, it provides spatial maps of poor correlation, which help localizing mode shape correlation errors and thus prepare the selection of model changes in updating procedures.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsPost-print
dc.subjectModal assurance criterion
dc.subjectIdentification error
dc.subjectLocalization of poor correlation
dc.titleCharacterization of identification errors and uses in localization of poor modal correlation
ensam.embargo.terms2017-05-22
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.11.006
dc.typdocArticle dans une revue avec comité de lecture
dc.localisationCentre de Paris
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur: Mécanique: Mécanique des solides
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur: Mécanique: Mécanique des structures
ensam.audienceInternationale
ensam.page62–80
ensam.journalMechanical Systems and Signal Processing
ensam.volume88
ensam.peerReviewingOui
hal.description.error{"author":["Missing affiliation for all authors"]}
hal.statusunsent
dc.identifier.eissn1096-1216


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record