Comparison of least squares and exponential sine sweep methods for Parallel Hammerstein Models estimation

Dépôt DSpace/Manakin

Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.author REBILLAT, Marc
ensam.hal.laboratories
  86289 Procédés et Ingénierie en Mécanique et Matériaux [Paris] [PIMM]
dc.contributor.author SCHOUKENS, Maarten
dc.date.accessioned 2018-01-05T15:22:38Z
dc.date.available 2018-01-05T15:22:38Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.date.submitted 2017-12-14T10:45:24Z
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10985/12468
dc.description.abstract Linearity is a common assumption for many real-life systems, but in many cases the nonlinear
behavior of systems cannot be ignored and must be modeled and estimated. Among
the various existing classes of nonlinear models, Parallel Hammerstein Models (PHM) are
interesting as they are at the same time easy to interpret as well as to estimate. One way to
estimate PHM relies on the fact that the estimation problem is linear in the parameters and
thus that classical least squares (LS) estimation algorithms can be used. In that area, this
article introduces a regularized LS estimation algorithm inspired on some of the recently
developed regularized impulse response estimation techniques. Another mean to estimate
PHM consists in using parametric or non-parametric exponential sine sweeps (ESS) based
methods. These methods (LS and ESS) are founded on radically different mathematical
backgrounds but are expected to tackle the same issue. A methodology is proposed here
to compare them with respect to (i) their accuracy, (ii) their computational cost, and (iii)
their robustness to noise. Tests are performed on simulated systems for several values of
methods respective parameters and of signal to noise ratio. Results show that, for a given
set of data points, the ESS method is less demanding in computational resources than the
LS method but that it is also less accurate. Furthermore, the LS method needs parameters to
be set in advance whereas the ESS method is not subject to conditioning issues and can be
fully non-parametric. In summary, for a given set of data points, ESS method can provide a
first, automatic, and quick overview of a nonlinear system than can guide more computationally
demanding and precise methods, such as the regularized LS one proposed here.
en
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Elsevier
dc.rights Post-print
dc.subject Nonlinear system identification, Least-square method, Exponential sine sweep en
dc.title Comparison of least squares and exponential sine sweep methods for Parallel Hammerstein Models estimation en
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.015
dc.typdoc Articles dans des revues avec comité de lecture
dc.localisation Centre de Paris
dc.subject.hal Sciences de l'ingénieur: Traitement du signal et de l'image
ensam.audience Internationale
ensam.page 851-865
ensam.journal Comparison of least squares and exponential sine sweep methods for Parallel Hammerstein Models estimation
ensam.volume 104
ensam.peerReviewing Oui

Fichier(s) constituant cette publication

 

Cette publication figure dans le(les) laboratoire(s) suivant(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Recherche


Nombre de documents dans SAM

  • 2755 documents

Lettre Diffuser la Science

Mon compte

Rapport d'activité

Aide