Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIRAQI-HOUSSAINI, Mehdi
dc.contributor.authorAOUSSAT, Améziane
dc.contributor.author
 hal.structure.identifier
ROUCOULES, Lionel
199402 Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Information et des Systèmes [LSIS]
dc.contributor.author
 hal.structure.identifier
SEGONDS, Frederic
127758 Laboratoire Conception de Produits et Innovation [LCPI]
dc.contributor.authorVERON, Philippe
dc.date.accessioned2013
dc.date.available2013
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.submitted2013
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Innovation and Design Research, vol 5 n° 3 pp 61-76
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10985/6716
dc.description.abstractNowadays, product design is increasingly complex: not only must it answer customer needs through complex functions; it must also ensure traceability throughout the design process, keeping in mind that standards and stringent regulations must be complied with. Faced with new challenges, engineering practices have evolved to allow stakeholders to be able to manage projects in new work environments, especially during the early stages of design. After presenting a state of the art of early design tools used in product design and their integration in PLM context, we compare class diagrams for two of them : TDC software (Knowllence©) and RFLP module of CATIA V6 (Dassault Systems©). Then, our paper presents an experiment focusing on these tools, which aims to assess their usability, to evaluate and compare them. Users can raise issues, take note of which functionalities are appreciated, and provide qualitative feedback. We analyze the results obtained in this experiment and propose a comparison based on four topics: learnability, satisfaction of users, efficiency and error correction. Finally, we present some links between class diagrams and usability of the tools.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIJDIR
dc.rightsPost-print
dc.subjectEARLY STAGES OF DESIGN
dc.subjectSOFTWARE USABILITY
dc.subjectINTEROPERABILITY
dc.subjectPLM
dc.titleThe use of early design tools in engineering processes : a comparative case study
dc.typdocArticle dans une revue avec comité de lecture
dc.localisationCentre de Aix en Provence
dc.localisationCentre de Paris
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur: Mécanique: Génie mécanique
ensam.audienceNon spécifiée
ensam.page16
ensam.journalInternational Journal of Design and Innovation Research
hal.identifierhal-00781995
hal.version1
hal.submission.permittedupdateFiles
hal.statusaccept


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record