Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAYKENT, Baris
dc.contributor.authorPAILLOT, Damien
dc.contributor.authorKEMENY, Andras
dc.contributor.author
 hal.structure.identifier
MERIENNE, Frédéric
22594 Laboratoire Electronique, Informatique et Image [UMR6306] [Le2i]
dc.date.accessioned2013
dc.date.available2013
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.submitted2013
dc.identifier.citationJ Ergonomics 2013, 3:1 , 1-8
dc.identifier.issn2165-7556
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10985/6824
dc.descriptionVersion éditeur de cet article : Aykent B, Merienne F, Paillot D, Kemeny A (2013) Influence of Inertial Stimulus on Visuo-Vestibular Cues Conflict for Lateral Dynamics at Driving Simulators. J Ergonomics 3: 113. doi:10.4172/2165-7556.1000113
dc.description.abstractThis paper explains the effect of having an inertial stimulus (motion platform) for driving simulators on proximity to the reality for the sensed lateral dynamics with respect to the measurements and the perceptual fidelity using a questionnaire technique. To assess this objectively, the vestibular and vehicle level lateral accelerations (ay,sensed=ay_ vest, ayv =ay_veh ) were saved by using a motion tracking sensor and SCANeR studio software respectively. A confidence interval of 95% was chosen to test the correlations (Pearson’s correlation) and to fit models for the distributions of the visual-vestibular lateral accelerations with the multiple linear regression between the conditions of static (N=16) and dynamic (N=21) platform cases in terms of visuo-vestibular level lateral accelerations for the group of subjects (N=37). The results showed that the dynamic platform provides a higher lateral dynamics reality (positive correlation with an incidence of 90.48% for N=21) compared to the static configuration (negative correlation with an incidence of 50% for N=16) from Pearson’s correlation and a better fitted model and a lower visuo-vestibular cues’ conflict for the dynamic (R2 =0.429, the model is positive sloped, N=21) condition comparing to the static one (R2 =0.072, the model is negative sloped, N=16) from the multiple linear regression models. A two-tailed Mann Whitney U test yielded that the Ucomputed (2139)>Uexpected (1300.5) as p<0.0001, there was a significant difference between the sensed lateral acclerations for the static and dynamic platform cases. Disorientation related perception had positive correlations with the vestibular sensed lateral accelerations for the static condition whereas they were negatively correlated in the dynamic case. As conclusion, the dynamic platform presented a reduced level of motion sickness depending on the sensory conflict theory and the perception fidelity studies approved that dizziness was found to have a significant positive correlation with the vestibular level measured lateral acceleration in the static platform (r=0.293, p=0.037<0.05).
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherLongdom
dc.rightsPost-print
dc.subjectDriving simulator
dc.subjectLateral dynamics
dc.subjectVisuo-vestibular interaction
dc.subjectVirtual reality
dc.subjectSensory cues conflict
dc.titleInfluence of Inertial Stimulus on Visuo-Vestibular Cues Conflict for Lateral Dynamics at Driving Simulators
dc.identifier.doi10.4172/2165-7556.1000113
dc.typdocArticle dans une revue avec comité de lecture
dc.localisationCentre de Cluny
dc.localisationInstitut de Chalon sur Saône
dc.subject.halInformatique: Analyse numérique
dc.subject.halInformatique: Automatique
dc.subject.halInformatique: Interface homme-machine
dc.subject.halInformatique: Modélisation et simulation
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur: Mécanique: Vibrations
ensam.audienceInternationale
ensam.page1-8
ensam.journalJournal of Ergonomics
ensam.volume3
ensam.issue1
hal.identifierhal-00794925
hal.version2
hal.submission.permittedupdateFiles
hal.statusaccept


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record