Motion sickness evaluation and comparison for a static driving simulator and a dynamic driving simulator

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record AYKENT, Baris
ensam.hal.laboratories MERIENNE, Frédéric
ensam.hal.laboratories GUILLET, Christophe
ensam.hal.laboratories PAILLOT, Damien
ensam.hal.laboratories KEMENY, Andras
  133641 Technocentre Renault [Guyancourt] 2014-04-21T11:14:35Z 2014-04-21T11:14:35Z 2014-01-27 2014-02-14T21:03:56Z
dc.description.abstract This paper deals with driving simulation and in particular with the important issue of motion sickness. The paper proposes a methodology to evaluate the objective illness rating metrics deduced from the motion sickness dose value and questionnaires for both a static simulator and a dynamic simulator. Accelerations of the vestibular cues (head movements) of the subjects were recorded with and without motion platform activation. In order to compare user experiences in both cases, the head-dynamics-related illness ratings were computed from the obtained accelerations and the motion sickness dose values. For the subjective analysis, the principal component analysis method was used to determine the conflict between the subjective assessment in the static condition and that in the dynamic condition. The principal component analysis method used for the subjective evaluation showed a consistent difference between the answers given in the sickness questionnaire for the static platform case from those for the dynamic platform case. The two-tailed Mann–Whitney U test shows the significance in the differences between the self-reports to the individual questions. According to the two-tailed Mann–Whitney U test, experiencing nausea (p = 0.019 < 0.05) and dizziness (p = 0.018 < 0.05) decreased significantly from the static case to the dynamic case. Also, eye strain (p = 0.047 < 0.05) and tiredness (p = 0.047 < 0.05) were reduced significantly from the static case to the dynamic case. For the perception fidelity analysis, the Pearson correlation with a confidence interval of 95% was used to study the correlations of each question with the x illness rating component IRx, the y illness rating component IRy, the z illness rating component IRz and the compound illness rating IRtot. The results showed that the longitudinal head dynamics were the main element that induced discomfort for the static platform, whereas vertical head movements were the main factor to provoke discomfort for the dynamic platform case. Also, for the dynamic platform, lateral vestibular-level dynamics were the major element which caused a feeling of fear. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher SAGE en_US
dc.rights Post-print en_US
dc.subject Driving simulator en_US
dc.subject driver's perception en_US
dc.subject inertial cue en_US
dc.subject vestibular-level dynamics en_US
dc.subject motion sickness en_US
dc.title Motion sickness evaluation and comparison for a static driving simulator and a dynamic driving simulator en_US hal-00981166 *
ensam.hal.status accept *
dc.identifier.doi 10.1177/0954407013516101
dc.typdoc Articles dans des revues avec comité de lecture en_US
dc.localisation Institut de Chalon sur Saône en_US
dc.subject.hal Mathématique: Statistiques en_US
dc.subject.hal Mathématique: Optimisation et contrôle en_US
dc.subject.hal Informatique: Automatique en_US
dc.subject.hal Informatique: Base de données en_US
dc.subject.hal Informatique: Intelligence artificielle en_US
dc.subject.hal Informatique: Interface homme-machine en_US
dc.subject.hal Informatique: Modélisation et simulation en_US
dc.subject.hal Informatique: Robotique en_US
dc.subject.hal Informatique: Systèmes embarqués en_US
dc.subject.hal Informatique: Traitement du signal et de l'image en_US
dc.subject.hal Sciences de l'ingénieur: Automatique / Robotique en_US
dc.subject.hal Sciences de l'ingénieur: Mécanique en_US
dc.subject.hal Sciences de l'ingénieur: Mécanique: Vibrations en_US
dc.subject.hal Sciences du vivant: ingénierie bio-médicale en_US
ensam.audience Internationale en_US 1-12 en_US
ensam.journal Proc. IMechE, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering en_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Number of documents in SAM

  • 2890 references in SAM


My Account

Reporting Suite