Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author
 hal.structure.identifier
COLLIGNAN, Arnaud
164351 Institut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie de Bordeaux [I2M]
dc.contributor.author
 hal.structure.identifier
SEBASTIAN, Patrick
164351 Institut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie de Bordeaux [I2M]
dc.contributor.author
 hal.structure.identifier
PAILHES, Jerome
164351 Institut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie de Bordeaux [I2M]
dc.contributor.author
 hal.structure.identifier
LEDOUX, Yann
164351 Institut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie de Bordeaux [I2M]
dc.date.accessioned2014
dc.date.available2014
dc.date.issued2012
dc.date.submitted2014
dc.identifier.issn1474-0346
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10985/8332
dc.descriptionThis work is a part of workpackage 300 in the AXSPAD project. Several partners are contributing to this project: Altep Ingenieries, AXS Analyse de structure and AIRCELLE groupe SAFRAN. In particular, the authors would like to thank Florent Braure, Guillaume Ruiz and Nicolas Gehin.
dc.description.abstractIn most industrial design processes, the approaches used to obtain a design solution that best fits the specification requirements result in many iterations of the “trial-and-error” type, starting from an initial solution. In this paper, a method is proposed to formalize the decision process in order to automate it, and to provide optimal design solutions. Two types of knowledge are formalized. The first expresses the satisfaction of design objectives, relating to physical behaviors of candidate design solutions. This formalization uses three models, an observation one, an interpretation one and an aggregation one; every design solution is qualified through a single performance variable (a single objective function). The second model is related to modifications that may or may not be applicable to the pre-existing solution. The Designer is often able to define preferences concerning design variables. Some modifications related to this pre-existing solution, can be preferred to other ones. A hierarchy of design variables is proposed to formalize these preferences. The concept of arc-elasticity is introduced as a post-processing indicator to qualify candidate solutions through a trade-off between the performance improvement and their relative distances to the initial solution. The proposed method is used and applied to a riveted assembly, and a genetic algorithm is used to identify optimal solutions.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsPost-print
dc.subjectArc-elasticity
dc.subjectDesign space
dc.subjectGenetic algorithm
dc.subjectMechanical design
dc.subjectOptimization
dc.titleArc-elasticity and hierarchical exploration of the neighborhood of solutions in mechanical design
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aei.2012.04.001
dc.typdocArticle dans une revue avec comité de lecture
dc.localisationCentre de Bordeaux-Talence
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur: Génie des procédés
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur: Mécanique
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur: Mécanique: Génie mécanique
ensam.audienceInternationale
ensam.page603-617
ensam.journalAdvanced Engineering Informatics
ensam.volume26
ensam.issue3
hal.identifierhal-01020838
hal.version1
hal.statusaccept


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record