Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author
 hal.structure.identifier
MOAL, Bertrand
252950 Department of spine surgery
99538 Laboratoire de biomécanique [LBM]
dc.contributor.author
 hal.structure.identifier
RAYA, Jose G.
87617 New York University
dc.contributor.author
 hal.structure.identifier
JOLIVET, Erwan
99538 Laboratoire de biomécanique [LBM]
dc.contributor.authorSCHWAB, Franck
dc.contributor.authorBLONDEL, Benjamin
dc.contributor.author
 hal.structure.identifier
LAFAGE, Virginie
252950 Department of spine surgery
dc.contributor.author
 hal.structure.identifier
SKALLI, Wafa
99538 Laboratoire de biomécanique [LBM]
dc.date.accessioned2014
dc.date.available2014
dc.date.issued2014
dc.date.submitted2014
dc.identifier.issn1959-0318
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10985/9014
dc.description.abstract Objectives: To evaluate a protocol, including MRI acquisition with dedicated sequences for fat-water quantification and semi-automatic segmentation, for 3D geometry measurement and fat infiltration of key muscles of the spino-pelvic complex. Materials and Methods: MRI Protocol: Two axial acquisitions from the thoraco-lumbar region to the patella were obtained: one T1 weighted and one based on the Dixon method, permitted to evaluate the proportion of fat inside each muscle. Muscle Reconstruction: With Muscl’X software, 3D reconstructions of 18 muscles or groups of muscles were obtained identifying their contours on a limited number of axial images (DPSO Method); 3D references were obtained only on T1 acquisitions identifying the contour of the muscles on all axial images. Evaluation: For two volunteers, three operators completed reconstructions three times across three sessions. Each reconstruction was projected on the reference to calculate the ‘point to surface’ error. Mean and maximal axial section, muscle volume, and muscle length calculated from the reconstructions were compared to reference values, and intra- and inter-operator variability for those parameters were evaluated. Results: 2xRMS ‘point to surface’ error was below 3 mm, on average. The agreement between the two methods was variable between muscles [-4.50; 8.00 %] for the mean axial section, the length and the volume. Intra- and inter-operator variability were less than 5% and comparison of variability for the Fat and T1 reconstructions did not reveal any significant differences. Discussion: Excellent inter- and intra-operator reliability was demonstrated for 3D muscular reconstruction using the DPSO method and Dixon images that allowed generation of patient-specific musculoskeletal models.
dc.description.sponsorship Fondation Paristech, ISSG
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Masson
dc.rightsPost-print
dc.subjectmuscles
dc.subjectspino-pelvic complex
dc.subject3D geometry
dc.subjectfat infiltration
dc.subjectDixon method
dc.titleValidation of 3D spino-pelvic muscle reconstructions based on dedicated MRI sequences for fat-water quantification
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.irbm.2013.12.011
dc.typdocArticle dans une revue avec comité de lecture
dc.localisationCentre de Paris
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur: Mécanique: Biomécanique
ensam.audienceInternationale
ensam.page119-127
ensam.journalInnovation and Research in BioMedical engineering
ensam.volume35
hal.identifierhal-01088726
hal.version1
hal.submission.permittedupdateFiles
hal.statusaccept


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record