Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author
 hal.structure.identifier
GUERARD, Sandra
164351 Institut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie de Bordeaux [I2M]
dc.contributor.authorMANASSERO, Mathieu
dc.contributor.authorVIATEAU, Véronique
dc.contributor.authorMIGONNEY, Véronique
dc.contributor.author
 hal.structure.identifier
SKALLI, Wafa
164351 Institut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie de Bordeaux [I2M]
dc.contributor.author
 hal.structure.identifier
MITTON, David
164351 Institut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie de Bordeaux [I2M]
dc.date.accessioned2015
dc.date.available2015
dc.date.issued2014
dc.date.submitted2015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10985/9560
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to assess the biomechanical performance of a new generation of artificial ligament, which can be considered “bioactive” and “biointegrated,” implanted in sheep. Thirty sheep were implanted: 15 sheep received the artificial ligament grafted with a bioactive polymer (grafted) and 15 received the artificial ligament without a bioactive polymer (non-grafted). The animals were sacrificed 3 or 12 months after implantation. The knee kinematics, namely flexion-extension, anterior drawer, and varusvalgus tests, were evaluated using a fully characterized custom-made device. Afterward, the specimens were tested under uniaxial tension until failure. The flexion-extension showed significant differences between (grafted or non-grafted) artificial and native ligaments 3 months after implantation. This difference became non-significant 12 months postoperatively. The anterior tibial drawer was significantly increased 3 months after implantation and remained significantly different only for non-grafted ligament 12 months after implantation. Twelve months after implantation, the differences between grafted and non-grafted ligament biomechanical properties were significant in terms of stiffness. In terms of load to failure, grafted ligaments seem to have had slightly better performance than non-grafted ligaments 12 months postoperatively. Overall these results suggest that grafted artificial ligaments have slightly better biomechanical characteristics than non-grafted artificial ligaments 12 months after implantation in sheep.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publishertechno-press
dc.rightsPost-print
dc.subjectACL reconstruction
dc.subjectbiomechanics
dc.subjectin vivo integration
dc.subjectin vitro experiments
dc.titleBiomechanical evaluation of a bioactive artificial anterior cruciate ligament
dc.identifier.doi10.12989/aba.2014.1.4.239
dc.typdocArticle dans une revue avec comité de lecture
dc.localisationCentre de Bordeaux-Talence
dc.localisationCentre de Paris
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur: Mécanique: Biomécanique
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur: Mécanique: Matériaux et structures en mécanique
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur: Mécanique: Mécanique des matériaux
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur: Mécanique: Mécanique des solides
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur: Mécanique: Mécanique des structures
ensam.audienceNon spécifiée
ensam.page239-252
ensam.journalBiomechanical evaluation of a bioactive artificial anterior cruciate ligament
ensam.volume1
ensam.issue4
hal.identifierhal-01164007
hal.version1
hal.statusaccept


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record