<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SAM</title>
<link>https://sam.ensam.eu:443</link>
<description>The DSpace digital repository system captures, stores, indexes, preserves, and distributes digital research material.</description>
<pubDate xmlns="http://apache.org/cocoon/i18n/2.1">Thu, 12 Mar 2026 13:32:57 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T13:32:57Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>Influence of local geological data and geographical parameters to assess regional health impact in LCA. Tomsk oblast’, Russian Federation application case</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10985/22701</link>
<description>Influence of local geological data and geographical parameters to assess regional health impact in LCA. Tomsk oblast’, Russian Federation application case
BELYANOVSKAYA, Alexandra; SOKTOEV, Bulat; LARATTE, Bertrand; AGEEVA, Elena; BARANOVSKAYA, Natalia; KOROGOD, Natalia
The research paper is aimed to modify the human health impact assessment of Cr in soils. The current article presents the input of several critical parameters for the human health Impact Score ( IShum) assessment in soils. The modification of the IShum is derived using geological data — results of neutron activation analysis of soils are used in the IShum calculation; research area is divided using the watersheds and population size and density. Watersheds reflect the local environmental conditions of the territory unlike the administrative units (geographical areas of the studied region) due to their geological independence. The calculations of the characterization factor value underestimate the influence of the population size and density on the final result. Default characterization factor values cannot be considered during the assessment of the potential human health impact for the big sparsely inhabited areas. In case of very low population density, the result will be overrated and underestimated in the opposite case. The current approach demonstrates that the geographical separation in the USEtox model should be specified. The same approach can be utilized for other geo zones due to the accessibility of this information (area size, population size, and density, geological, and landscape features).
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10985/22701</guid>
<dc:date>2022-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>BELYANOVSKAYA, Alexandra</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>SOKTOEV, Bulat</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>LARATTE, Bertrand</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>AGEEVA, Elena</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>BARANOVSKAYA, Natalia</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>KOROGOD, Natalia</dc:creator>
<dc:description>The research paper is aimed to modify the human health impact assessment of Cr in soils. The current article presents the input of several critical parameters for the human health Impact Score ( IShum) assessment in soils. The modification of the IShum is derived using geological data — results of neutron activation analysis of soils are used in the IShum calculation; research area is divided using the watersheds and population size and density. Watersheds reflect the local environmental conditions of the territory unlike the administrative units (geographical areas of the studied region) due to their geological independence. The calculations of the characterization factor value underestimate the influence of the population size and density on the final result. Default characterization factor values cannot be considered during the assessment of the potential human health impact for the big sparsely inhabited areas. In case of very low population density, the result will be overrated and underestimated in the opposite case. The current approach demonstrates that the geographical separation in the USEtox model should be specified. The same approach can be utilized for other geo zones due to the accessibility of this information (area size, population size, and density, geological, and landscape features).</dc:description>
</item>
<item>
<title>The critical parameters of the human health impact calculation</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10985/20260</link>
<description>The critical parameters of the human health impact calculation
BARANOVSKAYA, Natalia; BELYANOVSKAYA, Alexandra; LARATTE, Bertrand; AGEEVA, Elena
There are many LCA methods and models (e.g. CML 1992, Eco-Indicator 95, IMPACT 2002+, TRACI, USEtox, etc.), used to characterize environmental impacts. Only four LCIA methods include spatial dimension at different geographical levels: Impact World+, LC-IMPACT, EDIP 2003 and USEtox (Bratec et al., 2019). Among these, three (Impact World+, EDIP 2003 and USEtox) include a human health impact category: human toxicity. The USEtox model, recommended by the European Commission, has already proved its efficiency for the coupling of environmental and geochemical studies. The Characterization factors of the USEtox describe environmental fate (FF) of the chemicals, their non- and carcinogenic effect (EF), direct and the indirect exposure (XF). All these factors vary depends on the applicable area. However, despite all advantages of the model, its geographical customization is rather generic. This paper presents the utilization of the already published case study (Belyanovskaya et al., 2019: 2020) with the indirect human exposure factor modification. The investigation present the modified biotransfer factor of the metals (Cr, Zn, Sb, As, Ba) of the meat product calculated specifically for different location inside the area “Central Asia”. The paper extends already published results with local data of the city of Vladivostok (Russia).
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2021 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10985/20260</guid>
<dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>BARANOVSKAYA, Natalia</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>BELYANOVSKAYA, Alexandra</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>LARATTE, Bertrand</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>AGEEVA, Elena</dc:creator>
<dc:description>There are many LCA methods and models (e.g. CML 1992, Eco-Indicator 95, IMPACT 2002+, TRACI, USEtox, etc.), used to characterize environmental impacts. Only four LCIA methods include spatial dimension at different geographical levels: Impact World+, LC-IMPACT, EDIP 2003 and USEtox (Bratec et al., 2019). Among these, three (Impact World+, EDIP 2003 and USEtox) include a human health impact category: human toxicity. The USEtox model, recommended by the European Commission, has already proved its efficiency for the coupling of environmental and geochemical studies. The Characterization factors of the USEtox describe environmental fate (FF) of the chemicals, their non- and carcinogenic effect (EF), direct and the indirect exposure (XF). All these factors vary depends on the applicable area. However, despite all advantages of the model, its geographical customization is rather generic. This paper presents the utilization of the already published case study (Belyanovskaya et al., 2019: 2020) with the indirect human exposure factor modification. The investigation present the modified biotransfer factor of the metals (Cr, Zn, Sb, As, Ba) of the meat product calculated specifically for different location inside the area “Central Asia”. The paper extends already published results with local data of the city of Vladivostok (Russia).</dc:description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
