<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SAM</title>
<link>https://sam.ensam.eu:443</link>
<description>The DSpace digital repository system captures, stores, indexes, preserves, and distributes digital research material.</description>
<pubDate xmlns="http://apache.org/cocoon/i18n/2.1">Wed, 13 May 2026 16:38:26 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T16:38:26Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>A preliminary study of stability in elite and novice 10 meter air pistol shooters</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10985/23403</link>
<description>A preliminary study of stability in elite and novice 10 meter air pistol shooters
CHADEFAUX, Delphine; VALDES-TAMAYO, Laura; MORENO FLORES, R.; POULET, Yoann; HERRERA ALTAMIRA, G.; HYBOIS, Samuel; COURSIMAULT, M.; SAURET, Christophe; ATTALI, Valerie; THOREUX, Patricia
Numerous processes are involved in 10 meter air pis-tol performance such as physiological (Tremayne andBarry2001), sensorimotor (Cheng et al.2017), or psy-chological (Baeck et al.2012). From a biomechanicalpoint of view, the posture stability has been investi-gated through the athlete’s center of pressure (CoP)(Ko et al.2017) as well as the upper-limb motion(Kevin et al.2003). A high stability, reflected by a lowCoP excursion and velocity, has been related to ahigh performance (Ko et al.2017). To understandhow to maximize the shooter’s stability, several pos-tural  features  have  been  discussed.  For  instance,(Hawkins and Sefton2011) pointed out that thehigher the stance width, the higher the CoP excursionand velocity, and the poorer the shoot performance.Under this framework, a detailed description of theCoP/Posture  relationship  may  be  noteworthy  tounderstand  shoot  performance.  For  this  purpose,although most studies focused on the whole-bodyCoP, we hypothesize that getting more insight intothe CoP evolution under each foot may be valuable toimprove performance. The objective of the presentstudy is therefore to compare the CoP under eachfoot for elite and novice shooters.
</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2020 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10985/23403</guid>
<dc:date>2020-11-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>CHADEFAUX, Delphine</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>VALDES-TAMAYO, Laura</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>MORENO FLORES, R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>POULET, Yoann</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>HERRERA ALTAMIRA, G.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>HYBOIS, Samuel</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>COURSIMAULT, M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>SAURET, Christophe</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>ATTALI, Valerie</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>THOREUX, Patricia</dc:creator>
<dc:description>Numerous processes are involved in 10 meter air pis-tol performance such as physiological (Tremayne andBarry2001), sensorimotor (Cheng et al.2017), or psy-chological (Baeck et al.2012). From a biomechanicalpoint of view, the posture stability has been investi-gated through the athlete’s center of pressure (CoP)(Ko et al.2017) as well as the upper-limb motion(Kevin et al.2003). A high stability, reflected by a lowCoP excursion and velocity, has been related to ahigh performance (Ko et al.2017). To understandhow to maximize the shooter’s stability, several pos-tural  features  have  been  discussed.  For  instance,(Hawkins and Sefton2011) pointed out that thehigher the stance width, the higher the CoP excursionand velocity, and the poorer the shoot performance.Under this framework, a detailed description of theCoP/Posture  relationship  may  be  noteworthy  tounderstand  shoot  performance.  For  this  purpose,although most studies focused on the whole-bodyCoP, we hypothesize that getting more insight intothe CoP evolution under each foot may be valuable toimprove performance. The objective of the presentstudy is therefore to compare the CoP under eachfoot for elite and novice shooters.</dc:description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
