• français
    • English
    français
  • Login
Help
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak (IBHGC)
  • View Item
  • Home
  • Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak (IBHGC)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Influence of double rods and interbody cages on quasistatic range of motion of the spine after lumbopelvic instrumentation

Article dans une revue avec comité de lecture
Author
NTILIKINA, Yves
1001017 Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak [IBHGC]
CHARLES, Yann Philippe
PERSOHN, Sylvain
1001017 Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak [IBHGC]
ccSKALLI, Wafa
1001017 Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak [IBHGC]

URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10985/19735
DOI
10.1007/s00586-020-06594-2
Date
2020
Journal
European Spine Journal

Abstract

Purpose This in vitro biomechanical study compares residual lumbar range of motion (ROM) and rod strain after lumbopelvic instrumentation using 2 rods, 4 rods and interbody cages. Methods Seven human cadaveric specimens were instrumented from L1 to sacrum, and pelvic screws were implanted. The pelvis was constrained and moments up to 7.5 Nm were applied to T12. Segmental L1–S1 ROM was analyzed by tracking radiopaque balls implanted in each vertebra using biplanar radiographs. Deformation within principal rods was measured by strain gauges. Four configurations were compared: 2 rods (2R), 4 rods (4R), 4 rods + ALIF at L4–L5 and L5–S1 (4R + ALIF), 2 rods + ALIF (2R + ALIF). Results Intact average global L1–S1 ROM was 42.9° (27.9°–66.0°) in flexion–extension (FE), 35.2° (26.8°–51.8°) in lateral bending (LB), 18.6° (6.7°–47.8°) in axial rotation (AR). In FE, average ROM was 1.9° with both 4-rod configurations versus 2.5° with 2R and 2.8° with 2R + ALIF (p < 0.05). In LB, ROM ranged between 1.2° and 1.5° without significant differences. In AR, ROM was 2.5° with both 4-rod configurations versus 2.9° with 2R (p = 0.07) and 3.1° with 2R ALIF (p = 0.01). In FE, strain decreased by 64% and 65% in principal rods at L3–L4 with 4-rod. When comparing 2-rod configurations, strain decreased by 1% in flexion and increased by 22% in extension at L3–L4 when adding an ALIF at L4–L5 and L5–S1. Conclusions Double rods and interbody cages decrease residual ROM in FE and AT. Double rods seem efficient in limiting strain in principal rods. The use of single rods with cages at the lumbosacral junction increases strain at the first adjacent level without cage.

Files in this item

Name:
IBHGC_EJS_2020_NTILIKINA.pdf
Size:
1.270Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Article
Embargoed until:
2021-06-16
View/Open
CC BY
This document is available under CC BY license

Collections

  • Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak (IBHGC)

Related items

Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

  • The effect of posterior non-fusion instrumentation on segmental shear loading of the lumbar spine 
    Article dans une revue avec comité de lecture
    CHARLES, Yann-Philippe; PERSOHN, Sylvain; STEIB, Jean-Paul; SAULEAU, E.A.; ccSKALLI, Wafa; ccROUCH, Philippe (Elsevier BV, 2014)
    Background : Lumbar stenosis and facet osteoarthritis represent indications for decompression and instrumentation. It is unclear if degenerative spondylolisthesis grade I with a remaining disc height could be an indication ...
  • Limiting interpedicular screw displacement increases shear forces in screws: A finite element study 
    Article dans une revue avec comité de lecture
    LIMA, Lucas Venancio; CHARLES, Yann-Philippe; ccSKALLI, Wafa; ccROUCH, Philippe (Elsevier Masson, 2017)
    Background context: Screw loosening has been reported for non-fusion devices. Forces on pedicle screwscould be related to kinematic parameters as the interpedicular displacement (ID), which consists of thedisplacement ...
  • Clinical Outcomes and Complications After Pedicle-anchored Dynamic or Hybrid Lumbar Spine Stabilization : A Systematic Literature Review 
    Article dans une revue avec comité de lecture
    PRUD'HOMME, Marion; BARRIOS, Carlos; CHARLES, Yann-Philippe; STEIB, Jean-Paul; ccSKALLI, Wafa; ccROUCH, Philippe (Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2015)
    Fusion is the standard in-strumentation for many pathologies of the lumbar spine. Wor-rying rates of failure, including adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), have consistently been reported. The interest for dy-namic ...
  • From in vitro evaluation of a finite element model of the spine to in silico comparison of spine instrumentations 
    Article dans une revue avec comité de lecture
    ccVERGARI, Claudio; GAUME, Mathilde; PERSOHN, Sylvain; MILADI, Lotfi; ccSKALLI, Wafa (Elsevier, 2021)
    Growth-preserving spinal surgery suffer from high complications rate. A recent bipolar instrumentation using two anchoring points (thoracic and pelvic) showed lower rates, but its biomechanical behaviour has not been ...
  • Relevance of using a compressive preload in the cervical spine : an experimental and numerical simulating investigation 
    Article dans une revue avec comité de lecture
    BARREY, Cédric; ROUSSEAU, Marc-Antoine; PERSOHN, Sylvain; CAMPANA, Sophie; PERRIN, Gilles; ccSKALLI, Wafa (Springer-Verlag, 2015)
    Simulating compressive action of muscles, a follower load attends to reproduce a more physiological biomechanical behaviour of the cervical spine. Only few experimental studies reported its influence on kinematics and ...

Browse

All SAMCommunities & CollectionsAuthorsIssue DateCenter / InstitutionThis CollectionAuthorsIssue DateCenter / Institution

Newsletter

Latest newsletterPrevious newsletters

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

ÉCOLE NATIONALE SUPERIEURE D'ARTS ET METIERS

  • Contact
  • Mentions légales

ÉCOLE NATIONALE SUPERIEURE D'ARTS ET METIERS

  • Contact
  • Mentions légales